Introduction
Cognitive dissonance is a powerful psychological concept that describes the mental discomfort experienced when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. This data model, presented using Richard Barker's ERD notation, maps the process by which individuals might anticipate and then avoid this discomfort. The model focuses on how a Promise leads to a Prediction of Future Behavior, which, if misaligned with actions, can result in Cognitive Dissonance and subsequent Avoidance strategies. The box-in-box structure clearly distinguishes the super-type "Prediction of Future Behavior" from its sub-types "Keep" and "Break".
Entity Table
| Entity | Description |
|---|---|
| Promise | An initial commitment or agreement made by an individual. |
| Prediction of Future Behavior | A super-type representing the expectation of whether the promise will be kept or broken. |
| Keep (Uphold) | A sub-type representing the action of fulfilling the promise. |
| Break | A sub-type representing the action of not fulfilling the promise. |
| Cognitive Dissonance | The psychological discomfort that arises from a discrepancy between the prediction and the actual behavior. |
| Avoidance | The actions or mental processes undertaken to reduce or eliminate cognitive dissonance. |
Conclusion
Modeling psychological phenomena like cognitive dissonance with structured techniques such as Barker's notation provides a clear, logical framework for understanding complex human behavior. This specific model highlights the path from a simple Promise and behavioral Prediction to the resulting psychological state and the subsequent drive for Avoidance. It serves as a useful blueprint for analyzing scenarios where expectations and reality collide.
Comments
Post a Comment